I know how important it is to preserve the identity of people who send in letters, but it gets kind of hard to do so when references which we cannot follow are made.
It’s unpleasant to see a reference being made about the most interesting profile found by Dr. Thais, if we cannot know which profile it is. The most interesting elements could at least have been transcribed to the audience.
Also, how about including an option for the person to identify itself, or allow someone to get in touch with this person – even without knowing who this person is, and give the person an option to write back or not.
For many times, I’ve become interested in giving continuity to some conversation (begun by a written message), but unfortunately I didn’t have the opportunity.
I believe that, by easing contact among people, and add more qualitative queries on profiles, the Dating Place would become more realistic.
26/12/2002
Answer
Hello!
It is possible to ask me for a contact with the author of some letter that has not been signed (the majority does not want their nickname published on the column).
Whoever signs an e-mail knows that their name will be published.
Regarding the main topic you speak about, I think you’re right. The profile that received my compliments unites humor, subtleness, and creativity, showing freedom of expression – without being trivial – becoming differentiated.
I have written about the PROFILE in the articles’ section. This degree of looseness and good use of space will depend on each one.
Next time I will post parts which I consider interesting so that it doesn’t look mysterious and inaccessible to everyone’s comprehension. I’ll do that without putting in risk the identity of the profile’s author, of course.
Join Now! Advanced search options, Two Way Matching, Anonymous identity, Flirt Instantly with FasTalk®